CIVIC SNAPSHOTS

City of Charleston · Planning Commission
🏙️ Clemson students document Stono Park history and missing-middle housing
Graduate preservation students from Clemson University presented an area character appraisal of Stono Park, a West Ashley neighborhood founded in 1939, detailing its architectural typologies, zoning mix, and long-standing presence of duplexes and ADUs as a model for missing-middle housing. The report also highlighted the historic stone house on Savannah Highway, saved from demolition in 2022, and warned of growing development pressure threatening modest half-acre lots. The Planning Commission accepted the report unanimously as an official city planning resource, now posted on the West Ashley Initiatives web page.

City of Charleston · Planning Commission
🏗️ Union Pier developer may seek zoning entitlement this fall
Planning staff noted that the private developer behind Union Pier on the lower peninsula has been conducting extensive neighborhood engagement and may come forward with a zoning entitlement application as early as fall 2026. The railroad lawsuit related to the site is reportedly nearly resolved. Commissioners expressed interest in a site visit and requested the developer be invited for a presentation or open studio appearance as part of Peninsula Plan alignment activities.

City of Charleston · Planning Commission
📋 Zoning rewrite on track for early 2027 adoption
Planning Manager Christopher Morgan reported that the procedures section of the new zoning ordinance has been returned to the consultant with staff comments this week, and revised drafts will soon be shared with the Planning Commission for discussion. The full ordinance is expected to be delivered by the end of 2026, with adoption likely in early 2027. The commission also discussed improving its working relationship with city council to ensure planning recommendations receive more careful review before council action.

City of Charleston · Planning Commission
📋 Peninsula Plan resumes with June relaunch and fall adoption target
Senior Planner Chloe Stuber briefed the commission on the resumed Peninsula Plan, which will extend the 1999 Downtown Plan framework to the entire peninsula, including the Upper Peninsula and neck neighborhoods. Key deliverables include weekly open studio hours at the Civic Design Center every Thursday from July through September, coordination with more than a dozen alignment projects, and a draft plan for public review in October 2026. Adoption is targeted for early 2027, with the plan feeding directly into the concurrent zoning ordinance rewrite.

City of Charleston · Planning Commission
💬 Tourism management plan to be embedded in Peninsula Plan
Staff confirmed that a new city tourism management plan is underway and will be closely coordinated with the Peninsula Plan, with most land-use and transportation elements baked into the Peninsula Plan document. Public engagement specifically focused on tourism is expected in late summer or early fall 2026. Commissioners raised practical concerns about parking, public restrooms, sidewalks, and traffic management as pressing issues to address before development further erodes available infrastructure.

City of Charleston · Ad Hoc Budget Committee
⛽ Rising fuel prices put city at risk of $746K budget overrun
Fuel prices have climbed sharply since March 2026, reaching a 7-day average of $4.46 per gallon in mid-May after the city budgeted $3.30 — the first year the per-gallon estimate was reduced after years of stability. If current prices hold and consumption matches budget, the city faces a roughly $746,000 fuel deficit for the year. Staff plan to encourage conservation across departments and may need to reallocate funds from departmental budgets later in the year.

City of Charleston · Board of Zoning Appeals / Zoning (BZA-Z)
🏗️ Downtown hotel wins parking reduction with monthly reporting conditions
A 50-unit hotel at 56 State Street near the French Quarter received board approval to provide 28 parking spaces instead of the required 34, with conditions requiring monthly reporting of overnight parking usage and an obligation to install additional mechanical stackers if demand exceeds supply for three consecutive months. The French Quarter Neighborhood Association and four written commenters all supported the application. Staff noted the variance reflects outdated parking standards being revisited in the ongoing code rewrite.

City of Charleston · Committee on Public Safety
🔥 Rewritten Emergency Operations Plan clears committee, heads to full Council
Charleston's fully rewritten Emergency Operations Plan, completed in 10 months by Interim Emergency Manager Veronica Gutierrez and Emergency Management Specialist Emma Dupuma, was approved unanimously by the Public Safety Committee. The plan replaces the 2021 version, establishes a five-year revision cycle with the next rewrite due by 2031, and outlines response, recovery, and preparedness frameworks for city departments. Priority annexes covering flood, tropical cyclone, winter weather, public information, and the municipal EOC operations guide are actively being developed as next steps.

THE DEEP DIVE

Historic Charleston Foundation’s Spring Advocacy Forum

Historic Charleston Foundation hosted its annual Advocacy Forum, “Charleston’s Future: Stitching Together Growth and Opportunities,” at The Charleston Museum’s Arthur Wilcox Auditorium.

The conversation focused on one big question: how does Charleston grow without losing what makes it Charleston? The night included an overview from Mayor William Cogswell, presentations from three speakers, a panel discussion, and audience participation around the future of the Charleston Peninsula. (Historic Charleston Foundation)

That matters because the City of Charleston is preparing a new Peninsula Plan, a comprehensive zoning update, and a coordinated affordable housing initiative. Those decisions could shape the peninsula’s historic character, livability, and long-term resilience for decades.

Mayor William Cogswell opened the night by framing Charleston as being at a pivotal moment. Not just for the next few years, but for the next 100 years.

His main focus was on four big issues: affordable housing, flooding and resilience, long-term growth planning, and tourism. The common thread was coordination. Charleston has too many major projects happening at once to keep planning one piece at a time.

One of the biggest pieces of the mayor’s remarks was Project 3500. The goal is to create a net gain of 3,500 affordable housing units in seven years.

For context, Charleston created just 399 affordable units over the previous seven years. So this is not a small increase. It is a major shift in how aggressive the city wants to be on affordable housing.

The mayor pointed out that Charleston’s Area Median Income has nearly doubled over the last 12 years and is now close to $100,000. But that does not mean every local worker is suddenly making more money.

It means higher-income people are moving here, which pushes the numbers up and puts more pressure on the people who already live and work here. The mayor was direct about it: wealthier people are moving in, and longtime residents and local workers are being displaced.

A major part of the city’s housing strategy involves five large Housing Authority properties on the peninsula. The idea is to redevelop those underused sites into mixed-income communities.

The mayor said the goal is not to move residents off the peninsula. The plan is to build new housing, keep residents in place, and create communities that are roughly 50% affordable and 50% market-rate.

The mayor also talked about the future of flood protection around the peninsula. But instead of describing it as a giant wall, he framed it as an extension of the High Battery.

The idea is a roughly 6.5-mile public waterfront promenade that also serves as flood protection. So yes, it would be infrastructure. But the pitch is that it could also become one of the city’s biggest public spaces.

The mayor also discussed Plan 2050, which would look at every entitled but undeveloped property in the city. In plain English, that means looking at what could already be built under the rules that are currently in place.

The goal is to understand where growth could happen, how many people that growth could bring, and how the city should plan roads, drainage, parks, services, and budgets around that future. That matters because Charleston already has significant growth potential under existing approvals.

The final major piece from the mayor was tourism. He said the city wants the new Tourism Management Plan to be resident-first.

That includes better data, stronger short-term rental enforcement, and a clearer understanding of how tourism affects the people who actually live here. The city also wants to collect and own its own tourism data year after year, instead of relying only on outside groups to define the impact.

Andrea Ostrodka of Toole Design Group focused on streets, mobility, and public space. Historic Charleston Foundation describes her as an urban planner with experience leading interdisciplinary teams on placemaking projects, including the Lowcountry Rapid Transit project.

Her main point was that streets are not just for moving cars. They are where people walk, bike, sit, shop, gather, and experience the city. In her view, streets are Charleston’s largest public space, and how we design them directly affects the quality of life.

Andrea described streets as the connective tissue of civic life. That means they are not just transportation corridors. They are part of the city’s social, economic, and cultural life.

A street can move traffic, but it can also support restaurants, small businesses, shade, safety, and everyday neighborhood life. The point was not that cars do not matter. The point was that streets have to serve more than just cars.

One of Andrea’s strongest points was that better sidewalks are economic development. A thriving sidewalk invites people to slow down, stop in stores, eat at restaurants, and spend more time in a place.

That means shade, benches, safe crossings, ADA access, protected bike lanes, and human-scaled street design are not extras. They are part of how a successful city works.

Christian Sottile, FAIA, of Sottile & Sottile, approached the conversation through preservation, urbanism, and beauty. Historic Charleston Foundation notes that his firm works primarily in Nationally Registered Historic Districts and focuses on urban design, civic architecture, historic research, and community-wide engagement.

His message was that Charleston should not be afraid to talk about beauty as a civic goal. Not beauty as decoration. Beauty is something that shapes how people experience the city, how buildings meet the street, and whether growth feels like it belongs here.

Christian described the city as a living body. That means the lower peninsula, upper peninsula, and Neck cannot be treated as separate pieces.

A decision in one part of the city affects the whole. That was one of the bigger themes of the forum: Charleston needs coordinated planning, not one-off decisions that ignore how everything connects.

Christian also talked about Charleston’s “thread count.” He was referring to the fine-grained street network in older parts of the city.

Smaller blocks, more intersections, and more ways to walk are a big part of why places like Ansonborough and the French Quarter feel the way they do. The warning is that large-block development can weaken that fabric if it is not designed carefully.

Jared Bramblett of Moffatt & Nichol focused on flooding, stormwater, and resilience. Historic Charleston Foundation describes him as a Senior Water Resources Engineer and Project Manager whose work includes contributions to the Charleston Water Plan and serving as Owner’s Agent for the City of Charleston on the Battery Extension Project.

His message was practical: Charleston cannot plan for growth without planning for water. And water is not just one problem. It is tidal flooding, stormwater, sea level rise, old creek beds, elevation, and how all of those things interact with streets and buildings.

One of the most striking points was that roughly 40% of the city sits within the footprint of old tidal creeks. Those creeks may have been filled in, but the water still remembers where it used to go.

That helps explain why some areas flood again and again. It also explains why elevation matters so much when the city talks about future development.

Jared made a simple but important point: you cannot have reliable rapid transit if the streets are flooded. That matters for the Lowcountry Rapid Transit project, future bus corridors, bike routes, sidewalks, and daily commuting.

Transportation planning and stormwater planning have to happen together. Otherwise, the city risks building mobility systems that fail during the exact conditions when people need reliability.

His point was not that one big project will solve everything. The Battery Extension Project matters, but so do smaller site-level, block-level, and corridor-level fixes.

Charleston needs large infrastructure, better drainage, smarter building design, and nature-based solutions working together. In other words, resilience has to be layered, not treated like one giant silver bullet.

After the speakers, the conversation moved into a facilitated panel discussion moderated by Scott Parker, FASLA, of DesignWorks. Historic Charleston Foundation notes that Parker co-founded DesignWorks and serves on the City of Charleston Peninsula Task Force, The Friends of the Lowline, and HCF’s Advocacy Committee. (Historic Charleston Foundation)

This is where the big themes started connecting. Housing connects to transit. Transit connects to flooding. Flooding connects to street design. Street design connects to small businesses. Tourism connects to quality of life. And all of it connects back to the Peninsula Plan and zoning rewrite.

One audience poll asked whether Charleston can grow in a way that improves quality of life. 71% said yes.

That is important because it suggests people are not necessarily against growth. They are against bad growth. They want growth that is better planned, better designed, and more connected to the needs of residents.

The audience ranked design and architecture, stormwater and flooding, and streets and public realm as top priorities. Automobile mobility ranked last.

That does not mean traffic does not matter. It means this audience seemed more focused on long-term livability than simply moving more cars through downtown.

One of the biggest audience themes was: take back the streets. Many downtown streets are controlled by SCDOT, not the City of Charleston.

That limits what the city can do with trees, sidewalks, crossings, lane widths, bike lanes, and traffic calming. The panel discussed how important local street control could be if Charleston wants streets that feel like neighborhood public spaces instead of cut-through corridors.

The panel also touched on density. There seemed to be general agreement that Charleston needs more housing, but the harder question is what kind of density, where it goes, and how it is designed.

Missing middle housing, transit-oriented development, and smaller-scale infill came up as ways to add housing without relying only on large buildings that feel out of scale. The issue is not just whether Charleston grows. It is whether the growth feels connected to Charleston’s existing fabric.

Tourism came up again during the broader conversation. The point was that tourism cannot be treated as separate from planning.

Visitors affect streets, housing, traffic, infrastructure, short-term rentals, and the daily experience of residents. That is why the Tourism Management Plan is being tied more closely to the Peninsula Plan.

The forum was not about one project. It was about how all of these projects fit together.

Project 3500, the Battery Extension Project, the Lowline, Union Pier, the zoning rewrite, the Peninsula Plan, the Tourism Management Plan, the future of streets, the future of flooding, and the future of housing are all connected. If Charleston plans them separately, it risks missing the bigger picture.

Charleston is not deciding whether growth is coming. Growth is already here.

The real question is whether that growth will be coordinated, thoughtful, beautiful, resilient, and resident-focused. That was the main message of the night.

Charleston’s future is being rewritten right now. And the decisions made over the next year could shape the city for generations.

REAL ESTATE CORNER

Want specific area stats?
Click HERE to access more data and search all areas/zip codes